Hearts & Minds

Many, many thanks to all of you who participated in the Friday, 12:30 p.m., session on teaching evolution to religious fundamentalists. I appreciate the sensitivity and honesty you brought to our discussion. (And, you didn't eat me! I'm not sure why I was so nervous, but I really was. Thanks for your kindness.)

Thanks to Don, one of the participants, for the information from AAAS that I've linked here. A couple of people mentioned other resources, but I didn't write those down. If you have them, please post them as a comment (or e-mail them to me).

I look forward to seeing any questions, concerns, or comments you post. Please let me know how the session helped you and any suggestions you have for improving the session in the future. I plan on giving it again at NSTA regionals and nationals, as long as I can find funding for travel. Watch this blog for updates as to when I'll be presenting, and please join me again or send a friend.

Evidence 4 Inquiry/Falling Through the Cracks

Thanks to all of you who joined me at NSTA for these two presentations. I didn't feel like I was on message well for the Evidence 4 Inquiry session (Thursday at 12:30). I hadn't given that talk in a year, and I felt like it was a little disjointed. I hope the message came through. If you came on Friday morning at 8:00 a.m., I felt much better about that one.

Please let me know any thought that you have on what I said. I'm curious to know what I could do to make the talk more beneficial to the average classroom teacher who is considering getting started with inquiry. I would appreciate any suggestions you have. Also, let me know any questions that you have about anything I said. I'll be happy do whatever I can, including pointing you to resources that might help you with your question or concern.

NSTA follow-up

I promised a follow-up post to my NSTA presentations, but it may be tomorrow before I get those posted. Re-entry was a bear yesterday, and today is going to be just as busy.

NSTA Presentations

Here's my presentation schedule for NSTA this week:

Evidence for Inquiry: Thursday, 12:30 p.m., America's Center, Rm 261
Falling through the Cracks (re: evidence for inquiry; Sponsored by It's About Time Publishing): Friday, 8:00 a.m., America's Center, Room 127
Hearts & Minds in the Classroom (re: teaching Evolution to religious students): Friday, 12:30 p.m., Adam's Mark, Promenade D

See you in St. Louis (NSTA)

I'll be at NSTA from noon on Thursday until noon on Saturday. Let me know if you're going to be there so that we can catch up. I have 3 presentations I'm doing; I'll post my schedule on those early next week.

ASTE vignette

You can get the vignette linking our 3 papers by clicking the title of this post or the word "Link".

ASTE follow-up

Thanks to all of you who attended the session that included the paper set by John Settlage, Meg Blanchard, and me. I'm sorry that we didn't have time to interact on the paper, but I look forward to any comments you want to make here. A link to the vignette appears in the post above this one. You can get my paper by clicking on the word "Link" or on the title of this post.

Those of you who weren't at ASTE may want to scan through the paper to see if it's interesting to you. It describes the model of science teaching that has finally percolated in my head after my sabbatical teaching at Spain Park High School.

SW Minnesota Science and Math Teachers

Thanks to all of you math and science teachers who gave up your evening for Monday's meeting. I was honored by the attention you gave me during my talk, and I look forward to fielding your comments and requests for further information.

Make sure to check out the links to the side for some of the information I mentioned:

For "Rising Above the Gathering Storm" and "The World is Flat", go to the Evidence 4 Inquiry link. Look there also if you want to go deeper regarding why inquiry should be used in our classrooms.

I mentioned several times the NSF curricula that has already been field-tested so that it works with students. To see those, use the Inquiry Resources link. Remember, don't make the mistake I did of trying to develop your own inquiry curriculum. Wow, that was hard!

For number talks, try Googling "number talks". (Use the quotation marks in your search string.) You should find a lot of good ideas that way.

I am very interested in any comments you want to post, and anonymous comments are absolutely fine. If you have any trouble making a comment, feel free to e-mail by clicking my picture to take you to my e-mail link.

Hoover AL Science & Math Reforms

On October 9, I presented a reform proposal to the Board of Education of Hoover City Schools. Ron Dodson helped me develop it. Click the link to see the proposal. If you're a Hoover community member, I'd especially like to hear your comments on the proposal.

The hyperlinks within the proposal probably don't work. If you'll shoot me a quick e-mail request, I'll send you the original Word document with working links.

Evidence 4 site back up

Don't know if you noticed that portions of the Evidence 4 Inquiry site were down. I just fixed the problem, and everything looks to be working again.

Alabama Science Teachers Association

It was great being with my home town crowd at ASTA. Unlucky spot for me--the dreaded 8:00 a.m. presentation, but I had a few noble souls fighting off the sleepies. I gave the Evidence 4 Inquiry talk, and I think it was helpful. If you attended, please let me know your feedback by posting a comment here. Also, see the link for information on "The World is Flat," the book I mentioned. I think all other resources are on the Evidence 4 Inquiry site.

ASTA Follow-up

Check back here later this week for follow-up from the Evidence 4 Inquiry session.

Revised Evidence4 Site

When you have a moment, please check out the revised Evidence 4 Inquiry site. I've updated the format significantly, and I've added content. Please let me know any comments that you have.

NAEP itself

Just had a chance to look through the 2005 NAEP results. They're laid out really nicely on the site (see link). You can really drill down into the data and see what's going on.

Washington State's NAEP Results: Me Too!

I wonder what's going on with NAEP and these LASER states! Check the link to see Washington State's strong showing on NAEP.

SC leads NAEP Gains

I was very interested to see my friends in South Carolina leading the nation in improvements on NAEP (see link). The most interesting thing to me was the SC is a LASER state. Most students in the state have access to learning via hands-on inquiry using NSF-developed curricula. To me, this may be the first national data showing how inquiry really does work.

Inquiry for College Prep

Thanks to my buddy Ron Dodson of Hoover City Schools for pointing out how the ACT has shifted so that it focuses squarely on inquiry. For those of you who teach in states where colleges accept the ACT (as the do throughout the South where I am) teaching by inquiry will help boost ACT scores. This means that inquiry will help some kids will get into college who wouldn't have via traditional science instruction. Inquiry will also help some students get into better colleges and earn scholarship money.

Check out the ACT science standards at the following site: http://www.act.org/standard/planact/science/index.html (or use the link below).

PD resources for inquiry!

At NSTA, I had the pleasure of meeting Lynn Rankin from the Institute for Inquiry at San Francisco's Exploratorium. She made me aware of a new resource they have published that looks really impressive. It's a website of some of their key resources for those of you who provide PD on inquiry:

http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/workshops/

Check it out when you have a chance. Please comment back with your thoughts about the resources you find there.

NSTA reflections

Thanks to those of you who came to my NSTA presentation in Anaheim. I was pleased with how it went, and I appreciated the comments that some of you said afterwards. This was a first run for me on this presentation about the evidence for inquiry (and against traditional instruction), and I wasn't sure how people would respond. Actually, I expected resistance and push back. There didn't seem to be any.

Are we beginning to turn the corner toward inquiry in this country? Someone I talked with at NSTA said that about half the presentations looked to be on inquiry. Maybe the momentum is beginning to build. I hope so. I'm really convinced now that it's the best things for kids.

Please see the following site for resources from my presentation. It's a quick webpage that I've thrown together for those of you who want to dig deeper on the evidence I reviewed. Let me know your thoughts via a comment to this post.

http://homepage.mac.com/lmeadows/evidence4inquiry.htm

See you in Anaheim (NSTA)?

I hope to see you in Anaheim at NSTA this week. I'll be presenting, but I have been given probably the worst presentation slot possible! I'll be presenting at 8:00 a.m. on Saturday morning in room 211B of the convention center. My topic will be the research base for traditional teaching vs. Inquiry. I'm going to have us look at the evidence from personal experience, from national and international comparisons, and from cognitive science. This presentation is part of an effort I'm making to try to line out how clear the research is that traditional instruction is bad for kids.

I have to attend NARST earlier in the week; so, I'll be at NSTA only on Friday and Saturday. Let me know if you want to try to get together.